CPD
Data artefact templates and rubrics
These templates are designed to be quick, defensible, and easy to explain. Use the rubric to check quality. Keep the output as CPD evidence.
How to use this
Practical, not perfection- Pick the tier you are studying and copy the template into your notes.
- Complete it for one real example (work, a side project, or a safe fictional scenario).
- Use the rubric to tighten it until it is defensible.
- Paste a short reflection into your CPD record: what you assumed, what evidence you would keep, and what you would do next.
Foundations. Data contract and glossary
Template + rubric + exampleTemplate
Rubric (what “good enough” looks like)
- Scope and boundaries are clear (what is in/out).
- Field meanings are unambiguous and owned.
- Quality expectations include thresholds.
- Evidence is identified (what you would log/measure/keep).
Worked example (short)
Example (short): Owner: Payments data team. Freshness: < 2 hours. Completeness: 99.5% for required fields.
Applied. Quality and trust plan
Template + rubric + exampleTemplate
Rubric (what “good enough” looks like)
- Next actions are concrete and realistic.
- Each check has an action and an owner.
- Incident plan includes rollback or containment.
- Evidence is identified (what you would log/measure/keep).
Worked example (short)
Example (short): Check: null rate for customer_id < 0.1%, action: block downstream refresh and page owner.
Advanced. Governance and operating model note
Template + rubric + exampleTemplate
Rubric (what “good enough” looks like)
- Trade-offs are stated, not implied.
- Decision rights are explicit (no 'everyone owns it').
- Evidence is identified (what you would log/measure/keep).
- Next actions are concrete and realistic.
Worked example (short)
Example (short): Schema changes require owner approval + automated contract tests.
