The same four architecture concerns across TOGAF, DODAF and FEAF DODAF and FEAF answer the same four concerns as TOGAF but ship a different artefact for each, so mapping a concern across the row reuses work only once you declare which equivalence is exact and which is partial.
The same four architecture concerns across TOGAF, DODAF and FEAF
A comparison grid grouped by concern. Three framework headers run across the top: TOGAF from the Open Group as the accent-tinted reference column, then DODAF and FEAF. Four row groups follow; each opens with a full-width concern strip, then three cells name the equivalent artefact. Stakeholders and context: stakeholder map, OV-1 and OV-2, BRM stakeholders. Capability: capability map, CV-2, BRM mission sectors. Application and interface: application portfolio, SV-1 and SV-3, ARM applications. Technology and standards: technology architecture, StdV-1 and StdV-2 (the standards profile and forecast), and the FEAF IRM, its infrastructure reference model.
Stakeholders and context Who matters, and the picture they share Stakeholder map Phase A artefact OV-1, OV-2 Operational context BRM stakeholders Business reference model Capability What the organisation must be able to do Capability map Phase B artefact CV-2 Capability taxonomy BRM mission sectors Functional taxonomy Application and interface What software exists and how it connects Application portfolio Phase C artefact SV-1, SV-3 System interfaces ARM applications Application reference model Technology and standards What it runs on and the rules it follows Technology architecture Phase D artefact StdV-1, StdV-2 Standards profile and forecast IRM Infrastructure reference model
